1 min readUpdated: Category: Industrial Manufacturing
Initial Situation
A manufacturing company was operating an ERP landscape with over a decade of accumulated custom code. A conversion path had not been decided, but the program deadline was already fixed in the executive board plan.
Challenge
Without a factual basis, two camps opposed each other: a new build versus converting the existing landscape. Neither position could be substantiated with hard numbers.
What OXORY Did
In a four-week readiness assessment, we analyzed the impact of core system modernization, compared conversion paths, and created a target sizing. This included a custom code analysis, an evaluation of interfaces, and a schedule model for each path.
Result
- Decision in favor of the brownfield path, substantiated by an effort and risk comparison
- Custom code scope reduced by **35%** (decommissioning of unused developments)
- Around **five months** of planning time saved by bringing the fundamental debate to an end
Applicable to
Organizations with a high share of custom developments facing a modernization decision that need a robust proposal for executive management.
More articles
— AMS & support
In-House Team or Outsourced AMS? Decision Matrix for SAP Support
— AMS & support
How to Calculate SAP AMS Costs
— Shoring
SAP Shoring or Nearshore? Model and Cost Comparison
