#20260907013_EN1 min readUpdated: Category: Industrial Manufacturing
Background
A manufacturing company operated an ERP landscape with over a decade of accumulated custom code. A conversion path had not yet been decided, yet the program milestone was already locked in the board schedule.
Challenge
Without a solid factual foundation, two camps were in conflict: a greenfield rebuild versus conversion of the existing system. Neither position could be backed by hard numbers.
What OXORY Did
In a four-week readiness assessment, we analyzed the impact of core system modernization, compared the conversion paths, and created target sizing. This included custom code analysis, interface evaluation, and a timeline model for each path.
Results
- Decision in favor of the brownfield path, backed by effort and risk comparisons
- Custom code footprint reduced by **35%** (decommissioning unused developments)
- Around **five months** of planning time saved by putting an end to fundamental debates
Applicable to
Organizations with a high proportion of custom developments facing a modernization decision and needing a reliable business case for executive management.
More articles
— AMS & support
In-House Team or Outsourced AMS? Decision Matrix for SAP Support
— AMS & support
How to Calculate SAP AMS Costs
— Shoring
SAP Shoring or Nearshore? Model and Cost Comparison
